interesting huh? maybe even in the first beginnings of CD the inflamation may not bother us but inhibits nutrient absorbtion? who knows.
as a side note, when i was in high school boys were considered tall if 5'10" or taller there were some 6'and up that stood out.. and girls were tall if they were 5'6" and up.. now it seems every boy i see is 6' and lots of them are 6' 2-3! and girls are common at 5'10-11. is it just me being more observant? or is our higher nutritional standards really affecting the kids the last 20 years? i saw a news report a couple weeks ago that the "average" age for girls to develop now in the us and europe was age 8-9!! thats just wrong. no being a kid anymore..
Post Edited (randynoguts) : 9/2/2010 9:36:11 PM (GMT-6)