Posted 4/7/2015 2:15 AM (GMT 0)
Any doctor will tell you (and Crohn's patient) that it is much, much better to be in remission while pregnant than to flare. So here's what disclaimers say: "this will double or triple your cancer risk!" Since in reality, the risk is only 1% for a healthy person, then it only goes up to 2% or 3%. Does that make sense?
When I was pregnant, I was on Remicade infusions. I had really, really bad hyperemesis the whole pregnancy and started getting dehydrated really bad around 8 weeks. This made my Crohn's start flaring and going crazy, which meant I had to get put on prednisone. Prednisone is not very good for developing babies because it interferes with how their bodies will develop and produce their own hormones. (It is given to preemies because at the end of pregnancy it can help lungs develop faster.)
After we got the flare under control, I started flaring again because of dehydration. The doctors said that if I kept flaring, I would most likely miscarry. I ended up having to get IV fluids every single day for most of the pregnancy, but it meant that Remicade was able to work and I didn't have to be on prednisone.
Putting it this way: the potential risks of Remicade are much lower than the almost-guaranteed risks of flaring and miscarrying or delivering way too early. For me, I would much rather to the Remicade every time.