This was written on another thread:
www.healingwell.com/community/default.aspx?f=17&m=3440170 But I just quoted this response as your issue reminded me of her's in a way.
I think NCOT's suggestions above are well worth thinking about
. I went through a few GI's myself to get to the right one.
irishgal1 said...
"pb4 - I'd suggest at least give AMAT some real consideration prior to surgery. If nothing else, it doesn't work and you end up getting the surgery anyway. But if it works, you are better!! Weird about your constipation/frequency issues. I've never had an issue with constipation. Kind of would be nice for a change! I'm the other end of the spectrum.
This is the first therapy I've seen that claims to hit at a potential cause of Crohn's, and also the first that doesn't seek to control inflammation, but kill what these docs think is causing the inflammation. Like I've mentioned before, I only tried this as a last resort. I was dying. I'd already had a resection and blown through all the treatments out there. I wasn't even 40. I did a LOT of research on anything that could help me, and found this, which seemed like the best, most accessible alternative. Still, it wasn't easy to summon the courage to try something that my GI advised against and I had just heard about online. I couldn't even find one success story on any forum of people to ask about it! (That's part of the reason there are a bunch of stories from regular people who have had success on AMAT on TheCrohnsInfection. I wanted patients considering this to know others had succeeded. BTW - I worked with all of those patients individually to tell their own stories, and I can assure you each and every one is a real person!) When I talked to Dr. Chamberlin though, he said he had treated 250 patients over 20 years, had a 50% remission rate and a 70% improvement rate. With nothing left, I gave it a try! It's not without risk (like CDiff, obstruction and resistance/recurrence) but neither were the AntiTFNFs or prednisone I took.
NiceCupofTea - it certainly won't work for everyone. When I was researching, the thing that made me think it would work for me was that flagyl always worked well in the past, but it wasn't a maintenance therapy. When I'd go off flagyl, I'd get sick again. Flagyl has some MAP killing properties, so it made sense to me that this may work in my case. As an aside - Remicade also has some MAP killing properties and can push it into a dormant state, possibly giving it more success than just reducing the inflammation.
We'll know more when RedHill is done and John Aitken publishes."