Badstomach said...
I ask this because for the past month or so I have been reading about people that have crohns yet they have clear colonoscopy and endoscopy biopsy results.
Judging from people's stories on HW, some doctors seem to think if your tests are clear now that means you can't have Crohn's, which is absolute nonsense if your scopes showed Crohn's in the past. If you really do have Crohn's, clear tests signify that you are in remission, not that you never had Crohn's to begin with.
Most Crohn's patients are diagnosed with with a colonoscopy. Other conditions will usually have been ruled out first, e.g. coeliac disease, infectious causes of diarrhoea. Crohn's usually affects the terminal ileum and so a colonoscopy will find it. But if the Crohn's is higher up in the small bowel, beyond the reach of a colonoscope, then something like an MRI scan or pillcam is needed to find it.
You don't mention having had a colonoscopy, so get one booked ASAP because that is the only way you can find out. Upper endoscopies are almost completely useless for diagnosing Crohn's, since they can only go as far down as the duodenum - and it's rare for Crohn's to affect the stomach or duodenum. The guff about
it being able to occur anywhere in the GI tract is true, but it far prefers to hang out in the terminal ileum and colon.
I was diagnosed via colonsocopy and small bowel barium follow-through. (The latter test has largely been replaced by MRI small bowel scans, but I am talking 17 years ago here.) Before I had those I had blood and stool tests - the latter would have been to rule out pathogenic causes of diarrhoea, such as c. diff. I was 'lucky' in the sense I got diagnosed first time and didn't have to spend years in the no diagnosis wilderness.