Posted 12/20/2017 1:28 PM (GMT 0)
This is from a journal article of a study in 2009:
A total of 228 perforations were diagnosed after 277,434 colonoscopies, which corresponded to a cumulative 7-day incidence of 0.082%. The OR of getting a perforation from a colonoscopy compared with matched controls (n = 1,072,723) who did not undergo a colonoscopy was 27.6 (95% CI, 19.04-39.92), P < .001. On multivariate analysis, when comparing the group that had a perforation after a colonoscopy (n = 216) with those who did not (n = 269,496), increasing age, significant comorbidity, obstruction as an indication for the colonoscopy, and performance of invasive interventions during colonoscopy were significant positive predictors. Performance of biopsy or polypectomy did not affect the perforation risk. The rate of perforation did not change significantly over time.
So your risk of colon cancer is dramatically higher than your risk of perforation. But in answer to your question, my niece did experience a perforation during her last colonoscopy. She developed a high fever and needed high dose antibiotics, but the perforation repaired itself and she didn't need surgery. I think that surveillance for Crohn's disease and cancer is necessary and the benefits outweigh the risks.