I have seen people on this forum tell others that fibromyalgia CAN'T cause inflammation, that if someone has any inflammation they must not have fibro or else they must have another unrelated condition in addition to fibro, etc. I object to those kinds of statements because:
1) According to studies a lot of people with fibro
do have inflammation that hasn't been attributed to another disorder. In addition, it's also widely accepted that many people with CFS have inflammation but there is disagreement in the medical community as to whether CFS and fibro are even separate disorders or are in fact just 2 slightly different expressions of the same thing.
2) Fibro is not a disease per se, it doesn't "cause" or "not cause" anything, it is simply a "syndrome" - a collection of symptoms where no other cause has been detected. We have no idea what causes fibro.
The correct thing to say would be that inflammation is not part of the fibro diagnosis, that it is not necessary to have inflammation to be diagnosed with fibro, and that there are many people with fibro with no inflammation detected (note that that doesn't necessarily mean someone has no inflammation whatsoever, just that none has been detected). The symptom lists for fibro are constantly evolving. The symptoms
needed for diagnosis are not exclusive, it does not mean any symptoms not listed are not fibro and nothing to do with it. Some lists of symptoms of fibro do list inflammation, most don't currently. So one could say that too, that "inflammation is not usually listed as a symptom of fibro".
I think it would also be fine to say that if someone has inflammation that that should be further investigated in case a cause can be found. But to say someone "doesn't have fibro" if they have inflammation, like I've seen people say, doesn't seem helpful to me, nor to make bold pronouncements about
what symptoms definitely are and aren't fibro or what fibro definitely can and can't do - we don't even understand what fibro is! How can it have such strict rules?
This reminds me of the pronouncements that certain people make that "fibro can't get worse over time". I think that comes from a misunderstanding of what is meant when certain doctors say fibro is not a "progressive illness".
Post Edited (Pelagicdancer) : 6/10/2013 12:52:24 PM (GMT-6)