Hi everyone!
I have been reading a huge number of posts recently, and contributing to a few. There are a few thoughts I keep getting when reading posts, and thought I'd share - bit of debate can't be bad surely.
1) There are a huge number of horror stories about long-term Lymes here, and very few success stories. Is this really representative of how bad Lyme Disease is for the majority of people, or is it because people who are unlucky enough to stay ill keep involved in the forum and people who get better don't think to?
2) It seems to be generally assumed that a treatment which causes sudden worsening symptoms is due to herxing and is therefore a sign that treatment is working. There is good evidence for this in general, but does it mean that it is impossible to tell when drugs (be it antibiotics or herbal) are actually causing damage/making things worse?
3) Lyme Disease has many strains. I gather in the USA Lyme arthritis is more common than in Europe, as one example. Does anyone know if there is any evidence of different drugs being particularly effective in different countries/against different strains. And, is there any indication that Lyme Disease in one place is worse than another?
Hope my questions may cause some interesting debate. Would be really interested to know what you all think...
Kirsty