KariW93 said...
Thanks everyone. The LLMD had testing done for all other tick born diseases-it was negative. Now I know that the testing isn't great for Lyme disease, but the fact that these tests came back negative-is that a bad sign?
I'm still not all that convinced this is for sure Lyme disease. I keep doubting myself, but you guys seem to help me keep hope. Is it normal for these tests to come back negative too?
The LLMD doesn't really help keep hope either. I still am unsure why he told us Igm 23 isn't significant.
-Kari
Kari - I'm thinking with your research, you most likely know who Dr. Horowitz is?
Take a look at this article - he lists the bands that are significant.
www.publichealthalert.org/-interview-with-dr-horowitz.html"We need to examine the ticks and find out which organisms and strains of these infections (bacteria, viruses and parasites) are in the ticks in each state, and then create more region-specific Western Blots. This may help improve the sensitivity of these tests. Then in making the diagnosis, we can't rely on CDC criteria, which is intended for health departments to epidemiologically screen large populations; We need to teach doctors how to make a clinical diagnosis of Lyme disease after ruling out other diseases, supporting that diagnosis by finding borrelia-specific bands on the Western Blot, which show evidence of exposure. This would include finding the 23(OspC), 31(OspA), 34(OspB), 39, and 83-93 kDa bands on the Western Blot. If the patient has classic Lyme symptoms such as migrating joint and muscle pain, with good days and bad days, and symptoms that come and go, made better or worse with antibiotics, you need to use your clinical judgment and recognize that those are classic Lyme symptoms."