Shoot - it is gone! Weird. If you'd like to repost, I think you mentioned what your LLMD mentioned about
treating babs first and what you're currently treating with.
It is absolutely true that IV is not required for nearly any manifestation of Lyme. Some think IV is required for chronic or neuro Lyme but there has been a lot of success for those people with other means, as well. Generally, people choose IV over oral abx due to severe GI issues like I had that would prevent proper absorption of oral abx through the gut. Personal experiences may vary but there are studies that showed similar success between oral and IV abx, with comparable levels of penetration through the blood-brain-barrier, key in addressing neurological manifestations.
Some LLMDs like to transition from IV to orals at some point, but I understand this less. Regardless, each person is different, has a different landscape within which the illness(es) have developed, have different combinations of challenges to the immune function and other problems, and respond differently to treatment.
I had the most neuro issues after being on various short courses of abx for chronic sinusitis and bronchitis - didn't know I had Lyme & Co at the time. They cleared up pretty well w/ Rocephin until I started on herbs to bust biofilms, then some flared again... and subsided after continuing on the Rocephin.
I've read many accounts of Lyme patients who have had to cycle through different antibiotics and different doses and pulsing and combinations of detoxing in order to make progress.
That's not to say that your solutions won't like in tackling babs first. I agree - GUESS WORK!
-p
Post Edited (Pirouette) : 5/2/2017 3:00:17 PM (GMT-6)