Garzie: what about
other people's poo
Only 2 of the toothbrushes were actually used, with the other 22 unused (only rinsed every day). 2 of the unused 22 weren't even kept in the bathroom.
I agree with the sentiment that this probably wouldn't surprise the scientific community. I was just wondering what types of microbes would be found on the toothbrushes that actually go into those kids' mouths from the op article, if they were tested in the same way that the masks were.
The op article is just another misguided attempt at making masks seem scary - granted the moisture in masks creates a nice environment for all sorts of microbes.
Here's another thought: were the pathogens first on the kid's hands? If so the masks probably protected from transfer to noses and mouths.
Were the pathogens first airborne before clinging to the mask? Then we can assume the masks helped to protect throats and lungs.
Post Edited (potsnpans) : 6/17/2021 10:25:02 AM (GMT-6)