Bio-Resonance versus Rife

I did Quantum Biofeedback, which seems to be similar. After my treatment I went home and had a mild but definate herx. It was an interesting experience that I will be repeating.

 

some of the bioresonance people make up sort of a homeo conconction based upon the readings and diagnosis from the machine..it is i belive supposed to send the frequencies to the distilled water that is what your body needs.

from personal results, these treatments alleged by "Das machine" did not translate into long term or even short term benefits for me

rifing is based open the work of dr Rife who used frequencies to kill cancer. This does work as long as you find the right frequency for the right bug-viral...There is a lot of medical research going on regarding these frequency machines now..

Jess - I don't see her for a while - probably 6 weeks - trying to set up an appt now!

this is a good site, scott adams used to own-moderate it, and before that bryan rosner used to own it
so it "used" to be very good

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Lyme_Rife/

you may find someone who will let you try one out...I have not been on for over 2-3 years though

WWJD--
Can you tell me what kind of a Rife machine you have and the approximate cost??
Thanks!!

I know quite a few people who are totally banking upon
Bio-Resonance for their positive Bb & Coinfection diagnosis.

I have my reservations.......

Rob

So the person I ended up trusting the most on frequency devices was dr Pawluck. He’s written a book or so on it. There’s also a guy named Jerry tenant who seemed to be a tad more reliable than many of the others selling devices. This is a link to dr Pawluck’s YouTube channel https://m.youtube.com/c/drpawluk/videos. Pawluck’s books are filled with tons of research papers to back up what he says. The one I read part of was power tools for life. He also co-wrote a textbook. He also is forthright about what he thinks are unsupported claims commonly spread around about the benefits of pemf or rife devices and which things he believes are blatantly false.

N.N. Also has been doing some work with fsm (frequency specific micro current). I think he was doing research studies with J.C..

This is not exactly what you are asking for, but it's relevant:

In the New York Times lately, many pieces about chronic Lyme have been published by long-time NYT journalist Ross Douthat, as he has dealt with chronic Lyme for years. He talks about using rife in the latest one. He was skeptical of it at first, like many alternative treatment modalities, but as conventional treatments failed to give him the degree of progress he wanted, he describes himself as becoming more open-minded, willing to try things that seemed strange to him at first, including rife - which he said worked.

I don't know if anyone has ever found funding for quality studies on rife. I'd be curious to see them, if so! In the alternative medicine milieu, I rarely expect to find the sort of research one might find for a pharmaceutical product, just because the major medical journals and funding sources have no interest in products that won't make them lots of money and/or uphold the medical establishment status quo.

I suspect that if somehow rife were suddenly very well-regarded with extensive double-blind, placebo-controlled studies published in the prestigious journals, then we'd have to go to specialists to get treatments, we could not buy and use machines ourselves anymore, building machines that aren't FDA-approved would be illegal, and we'd have to pay a great deal for appointments, plus insurance companies would determine which frequencies would be right for us based on CDC-sanctioned testing....

Anyway, I just generally doubt we'll find much more than the theoretical underpinnings to support most alternative medicine treatments, as we try to decide which science experiments to try on our bodies. That said, I'm all for trying rife. I did one treatment for Babesia and herxed like crazy (with Babesia symptoms, including Babesia symptoms I'd never had before) so I have no doubt that it works to kill microbes. In fact, it worked too well for me, and the herx was too destabilizing for me to try it again!

I like PEMF but it will not work well for people who are electrically-sensitive.

Bailey said...
Yeah sorry, I think Pawluck made a video about rife vs pemf. He tends to favor pemf over rife because of the lack of studies on rife. I never completely understood the science behind rife in that from my meager knowledge of physics it didn’t completely add up for me.

Another aspect of the frequency therapies is various light frequency therapies particularly red light therapies. I think there is a fair amount of research on red light being helpful for mitochondria but even in the papers they’re not sure why it helps.

Sorry if this is too off topic for this thread. In my mind I lump all the frequency therapies together.

no, no apologies needed - i was just curious to learn more and your input helped on that front

I still have a Spooky2 Generator X sitting here on my desk collecting dust because I have never understood all the different choices of frequencies and how you figure out which ones to use. I used the remote aspect for a while. It seemed to make a difference but I couldn't swear to it.

I tried a cheap version of spooky 2 and it just made my vision worse. I too was never sure how to use it. Later we purchased a pemf device. Generally speaking with continued use it made everything better, even things almost nothing else seemed to help for years. The one exception was my vision which it continually made worse. I didn’t want to go blind so I had to stop use. I’ve been frantically trying to fix my vision since.

So the question I have always had is "how do you know the correct frequencies?" There are so many for different disease and conditions. That is the perplexing part.