McLovin said...
I have been in treatment for 3 years and I feel great! I just did a follow-up test, and my Ochratoxin level is 15 ppb! It was completely negative 6 months ago. What happened?
Realtime labs answered this:
Are you still under treatment? If yes, it might be working and your body is detoxifying the mycotoxins. Are you still in the same environment? Talk to your healthcare provider.
That's something that doesn't sit well with me to be very honest. Here's how I see that answer:
feeling great * detoxing = high mycotoxin result
But if we apply that logic to a healthy person, wouldn't it be the same?
healthy person * detoxing = high mycotoxin result
As to WHY this lady who is now feeling great 3 years into treatment has a whopping high mycotoxin level, we don’t know. There’s not enough information given here to draw any conclusions. You’re not likely to find any rigid scientific research applicable here. “Detox” is practically a taboo word in mainstream medicine, and mainstream medicine continues to ignore or avoid the effects of mold and mycotoxins on human health in spite of the hefty research available on its effects on livestock. I am pretty sure that all of that research is in relation to feed contaminated or hay contamination.
There’s nothing really accepted by mainstream medicine in regards to the affects of mold or mycotoxins found inside buildings on human health other than articles published by Shoemaker, Brewer, Dennis, Lieberman, and others who have treated mold illness, sick building syndrome, CIRS, etc.
If you want the TRUTH, mold inside buildings is a problem that must be dealt with. Modern society likes to ignore this, but God Himself gave instructions about
mold remediation when He gave Moses the laws of sanitation. You can find it in the Bible in Leviticus 14:33-53. The King James Version translates the original Hebrew word as leprosy. Here’s an interesting Bible commentary on the passage:
https://biblehub.com/sermons/auth/macmillan/leprosy_of_house_and_garments.htmMcLovin said...
I left out one variable, which is 'treatment' in example #1. Because if that is a variable that's valid, then a healthy person's immune system should also be a variable, no?
Unless treatment is not equal to immune system, but if that's accurate, then in reverse, every person in a moldy environment should be sick. It just appears like they admitted the testing isn't valid. Or at the very least that they always have an "out" for unpredictable results. Am I completely wrong here about the testing?
If I understand what you’re saying, my response is No, treatment is not equal to immune system. According to Shoemaker, there are often genetic haplotypes involved which get “switched on” by something - often an acute infection or Lyme disease. That’s not to say a person has to have one of these genetic haplotypes to be sickened by mold or mycotoxins or water damaged buildings. Mycotoxins, themselves, are toxic. They are harmful, period.
How they affect individual human beings will depend on many factors - genetic activations; total toxin load; infections like Lyme/co that suppress the immune system and ALTER the immune response and cause general dysregulation among many body systems including the detoxification systems; species of molds and mycotoxins (they are not all equal); quantity of mycotoxins in exposure (quantity among mycotoxins is not equal); length of exposure; and more factors like the presence of heavy metals in the person’s body and the levels of EMF in the environment and the presence of pathogenic bacteria, viruses, and other microbial byproducts present in the water damaged building. The effects of these factors are synergistic and cumulative.
McLovin said...
Mold has definitely affected me, but I just have my doubts about the testing and some of the claims.
Understood. You are blessed in that you are aware that mold affects you. Many are affected but are still not aware. That awareness is a valuable tool. If you can tell when you are being exposed to mold, that’s a huge benefit that can help you avoid exposure.
The bottom line is mold inside of buildings is bad. It is a health hazard (and a hazard to the structure of the building). End of story.
It’s a dangerous idea to think that because mold is ubiquitous that it’s okay if every building has mold. Then you get into the reasoning of how much is too much. Mold spores are everywhere because they exist in the air outdoors, but mold GROWTH in building structures is not. Every building doesn’t have mold, although in some places it seems that way. Those that don’t have mold eventually will.
It’s hard to reason with those in the remediation industry, because they rely 100% on air sample testing and moisture readings. Air sample testing is inherently flawed, and moisture readings are only useful if it’s done during a time when the moisture is present.
It’s time for constructiom industry and building maintenance practices and mold remediation ideologies to change. Changing people’s minds is the greatest barrier standing in the way.