seems the agglutination test (SAT) is pretty sensitive and specific in acute cases - most papers seem to suggest above 80% or more for both - which is good for co-infections!
but then references also state that low SAT titres may be present in healthy people who previously suffered infection and in patients suffering chronic brucellosis or a relapse making diagnosis of chronic cases with SAT v tricky - the usual story with serology unfortunately
i think i would still run it if i could afford it - as having a clear target helps a lot even mentally with dealing with these illnesses - but at the same time being aware of the tests limitations
Post Edited (Garzie) : 4/22/2022 5:45:20 AM (GMT-6)