loski01 said...
Do they just give public verbal comment slots to anyone? I applied after seeing this when originally posted.
I’m one of 9 people randomly selected for verbal comment from the looks of it. Or just only 9 applied?
Either way.. I got 3 minutes to talk if anyone wants to suggest a good messaging approach.
I read their 2020 outline and they do seem to be much more up to speed than the cdc, so I don’t wanna hammer points they already know.
I might just tell my story and the failures the medical system had in my case and continues to have.
Wow! - Loski - that's amazing to hear you got a slot to speak - i suspect there were many many applications.
you kind a won the lottery there i think - but also the short straw - and now you need to speak
so, i wanted to help if i can -
in terms of what to advocate for
these people are the professionals that know the subject inside out and have done lost of work to zero in on where the biggest roadblocks are (i have spoken to some of their leading members and it impressed me - they are a fact based and highly professional organisation)
https://invisible.international/at the top level view - the biggest current issues driving why so many people are suffering are twofold
1, Diagnosis - all currently available tests are poor at diagnosing lyme (so people are never diagnosed - or diagnosed too late when treatment is much much harder) and people are left high and dry by the health system - because they have what is currently seen as a contentious diagnosis
2, Treatment - so even if diagnosis is made - the treatments are poor in terms of efficacy, lengthy, very hard to tolerate, and cause excessive suffering, health care costs, loss of earnings etc etc
there are other issues of course - but if these two key ones were fixed - diagnosis would no longer be contentious
and health care providers and insurance companies would be forced to act, and, if they had good treatments, that action would be effective.
however - the key roadblock right now is that almost all the government research funding - over 95% is going into what they call "basic research" - and for example - only a tiny fraction is going into human treatment studies and a similar v small percentage into effective diagnostics.
eg "The National Institutes of Health allocated only 0.24% ($420,558) of its total Lyme research budget for human
treatment studies from 2013 to 2020."
this point and more like it here
https://invisible.international/research/the reasons for this is that academics are in control of the funding decisions - and academics always want more basic research - and they are not the ones lying in bed in constant pain - or losing the years of the prime of their lives.
whereas the millions of people affectedly this disease - patients, their families and Lyme literate doctors want practical accurate diagnostic tests and effective treatments - NOW - not in 20 years when stuff finally starts to filter down from the academics' dogmatic pursuit of basic research.
if it were me - this is what i would bang the table about
.
i would:
*use the numbers from invisible international - as reliable facts on where the research money is currently going
*emphasise why we need that to change - as there is so much suffering RIGHT NOW
-maybe something from the official figures on the scale of the problem and how its escalating - 400,000 cases per
year in the last statement from the CDC i think - up from 30,000 official cases - then 300,000 - now 500,000 -
-of which its accepted over 20% or more fail current treatments - and become part of a huge population of long
term sufferers.
-ITS THESE LONG TERM SUFFERERS THAT NEED THIS HELP THE MOST - not the acute cases - as if
caught early and treated most of those will recover - even with existing drugs. its the large and growing
chronic population that has been ignored and disbelieved and mistreated and is suffering year after year - RIGHT
NOW
*colour it with a picture of the real personal impact of pain and suffering, isolation, rejection by the health system and insurance co's etc in your case and others you know of
*highlight the huge costs involved on a personal basis - not only treatment cost - but loss of earnings - not to mention costs to the state etc etc
i'm sure the academics will argue they need the basic research to come up with diagnostics and treatments - but this is not entirely accurate - its actually imperative to work the problem from both ends at the same time - again people like invisible international and other advocate groups have plenty of ideas of how this can be done today already - there is no shortage of ideas - funds are the main roadblock
another good set of data points
the more they hear these same points repeated from all quarters, patients , doctors, advocates etc - the better
hope its of some help
i appreciate you are doing this for the many who cannot - well done!!! - i would like to help so please do reach out to me if i can help further in any way - my email is in my profile
Post Edited (Garzie) : 11/19/2022 11:47:59 AM (GMT-8)