bluelyme said...
this aint reading teas leaves Garzie .its 1st year pathology 101. compare and contrast and do your own smears and stains and then one can say with some certainty. anything else is hearsay and misinformation. maybe persons have trouble with lightfield but with phase or darkfield there is no mistaking...
here is that bsk culture from the microscopy group , its clear as day
https://youtu.be/aFa6S8fB2Tk
https://youtu.be/dH3fGVndMYo
Thanks Blue
the first one is in my view clearly actual spirochetes moving across the slide under their own steam
these objects are the correct size for Borrelia Burgdorferi - being longer than a single blood cell is wide
- up to 3 or more time as as long as a red blood cell - its also normal to see this many organisms in a BSK culture - after a week or so - as that's what BSK is for
so - to summarise
-actual self propelled movement across the slide (not just drift or jiggling) = Check
-organisms length within the documented range of borrelia = Check
-numbers not out of line with expectation - as high numbers are normal in BSK culture = Check
so, everything here is consistent with what has already been discussed and these are to my mind almost undoubtedly spirochetes
however, and not wishing to offend, but anyone who cannot see the clear differences between the objects in this footage of a BSK culture - and those in the footage posted by blazer of fresh blood in the first post - hasn't done pathology 101!
sure they are both thread like objects - but again - to summarise
-self propelled movement across the slide - Nope - just jiggling on the spot (Brownian Motion)
-organisms within the known size range of borrelia burgdorferi - Nope - all below that range
-numbers in slide within expectation - nope - 1000's of times higher than numbers expected in fresh blood
in the end everyone has to make their own mind up - and its not my job to change it if someone is committed to one belief or another
i just want new members to be able to make their own mind up and not fall into the trap of confirmation bias or be abused by practitioners wanting to make a buck - or who are just somewhat ill informed themselves.
i am still ill after 8 years mainly because i have been told things that i believed to be true at the time -because the people telling me were apparently experts - but also because i was also so keen , if not desperate, as we all are, to find an explanation. this makes us very susceptible to suggestion.
But i later found much of what i was told by so called experts to be untrue - and each time this cost me months or years of my life going down some fruitless rabbit hole or other.
if there was anyone around to say at that time- "hang on, its not that cut and dried" -or - "there is more to the story" i would be much better off today - it could have saved me literally years of my life.
i am just trying to perform that function for others that i wish was around years ago.
again - i am not saying Blazer doesn't have Lyme - just that from the darkfield imagery posted
the thread like items do not match the documented morphology of borrelia in multiple ways
so, again - in my view, based on the points I raised, it does nothing to confirm or refute a Lyme infection