i think the confusion is arising because "endotoxin" is a general term
just meaning something that is made by the microbe that is toxic to the host
lipopolysaccharides made by most gram negative classical bacteria are just an example of one group of such endotoxin chemicals
this is the best known group - and some very specific examples are known and well studied - and so in some writing may be confounded with the general term "endotoxin" - while in reality many other types of endotoxins may exist - that are not lipopolysaccharides.
in fact Wikipedia says the two terms are often used interchangeably - even though it is not strictly correct to do so as clearly bacterial endotoxins exist that are not LPS - for example the lipoproteins of borrelia species mentioned above. and Wikipedia gives some other examples
Wikipedia said...
Today, the term endotoxin is often used synonymously with LPS, although there are a few endotoxins (in the original sense of toxins that are inside the bacterial cell that are released when the cell disintegrates) that are not related to LPS, such as the so-called delta endotoxin proteins produced by Bacillus thuringiensis.
in fact - if LPS a component of a bacterial cell wall - is considered and endotoxin - one could consider anything that is immune stimulating and therefore inflammatory to the host as an endotoxin in the general sense - in which case just about
every part of a bacteria - its body, its cell wall, the hundreds or thousands of chemical compounds inside - and the substances it exudes to influence the hosts immune system - or for instance build biofilm could equally be considered toxins.
the same is true for other bacteria - like for example bartonella - which is not thought to produce conventional lipopolysaccharides - and yet people report some of the worst herx like reactions from treating it - indicating that there are other things at play aside from lipopolysaccharides in driving a herx reaction.
overall there is ample scientific evidence that borrelia infections survive 4 weeks or more of antibiotic therapy - both in animals and in humans - each fully demonstrated by either PCR testing or the gold standard method - culture - there are at least 20 peer reviewed papers on this point alone.
here is a list of such studies
VIEW IMAGEsadly - although logically one would think one would just need to show doctors evidence and the point would be settled - in practice dogma wins -
if you can even get a conventional doctor to look at evidence - 9 out of 10 times they will dismiss it - as it doesn't fit with the dogma they have absorbed.
( i have tried at least this many times - and this is about
the batting average - at least in the UK)