MichiganLymie said...
Thank you Garzie. I may not have been clear enough in my telling. The relapse in the facial nerve palsy started to happen after stopping Banderol for one week. Then it started to improve again immediately upon restarting Banderol at its previous dose. All I really did was to pick up where we had left off one week prior.
apologies - i must have misread
i dont think you are doing anything wrong as such - its just an extremely difficult illness to navigate and your son is lucky to have such a devoted caring parent.
sometimes when we are so focussed on treatment, putting so much effort in and looking for expected results we can kind of over-state the cause and effect relationship - and we can be sure in our minds that A is causing B response
but over the years i have come to realise that many of the symptoms and effects are coming or going or fluctuating in intensity on their own rhythms for reasons that are unknown - yet can appear to line up with our interventions and give us the impression that there is a causal relationship
in reality even if something appears to line up in time - or seems to do so twice - it can be a random effect
3 times - and the same interval between intervention and effect - similar magnitude - starts to be more compelling
all this to say that its possible the symptom is fluctuating independent of the intervention
i know its often not a welcome finding when so much effort or faith has been put in an treatment already ( otherwise you wouldn't be putting effort into it ) but wanted to share my experience as i believe we have to be committed to dealing with what is - over what we would like to be.
this may or may not be the case in your particular example - but i wanted to share the concept in any case so you can at least consider it
to tray to adjust for this effect - for the last 3+ years i have kept a detailed daily tracker in MS Excel where i track interventions and symptoms - track moving averages, trends, recovery over time etc .
i have been subsequently amazed at how often it has proved invaluable - and how many times, by looking back at the data for past events the data either disproves my latest budding hypothesis - or shows me clues to a new one i had not detected subjectively.
i think such a tool is vital if self treating - ie without the benefit of the accumulated experience a LLMD has from treating 1000's of patients -as its a huge challenge to steer either ones own treatment or that of a loved one, through this extremely complex illness.
if you are not doing so already - i am sure the approach could be adapted to help with your sons treatment decisions.
all the best!