CD57

Binduspire

Regular Member

Joined : Jul 2013

Posts : 335

Posted 11/14/2013 7:06 PM (GMT 0)

I just went over my results with my doc and mine was 9.3 over 121. She said that is "not bad," and that most of her chronic Lyme patients have numbers like 2 over 20. She also said that these numbers indicate to her that Lyme might not be my biggest problem, but more likely Bartonella is.

We didn't get into much detail, but I just thought I'd share.

I think from what I rememebr on the Burrascano guidlelines, you want to be above 60 and normal is 200. (I'm assuming this means the bottom number).

Traveler

Elite Member

Joined : May 2007

Posts : 36573

Posted 11/14/2013 11:18 PM (GMT 0)

I'm not sure of what the different numbers all mean, but I do know that this is not a sure fire way of being able to tell how sick someone is with Lyme! It's one of many tools to help assess how a person is doing, not a 'stand alone' measuring device. So be careful in how you use that info, please. Your symptoms will tell you more about how you are healing and which infections you are dealing with - in my opinion from my own experience and from what I've read here on this forum.

For me, I didn't have bad Babesia symptoms until after I had almost completed Lyme and Bart treatments. It was all so unexpected that it startled me how bad things got so quickly!! As my bacterial loads got lighter from those infections, the symptoms of Babesia really came out.

✚ New Topic ✚ Reply