Posted 6/21/2015 2:47 AM (GMT 0)
Sorry that I posted that twice.
What most people don't know is that your diagnosis really has nothing to do with why/if your claim gets approved. It really is dependent on what evidence is in your medical file to show that you are unable to do basic tasks that are required to do any job at out there.
Your diagnosis mat slant things one way or the other, but only because they're judges not doctors. They have some of the same misperceptions. A lot of what they learn is what they hear on TV, like commercials and news programs. For a long time, no one knew what Fibromyalgia was and many doctors thought it was in our heads (some still do). Then it became one of the more main stream diseases and so Judges started learning about it. In one state, there were day long conferences that the judges had to attend to learn about Fibromyalgia because all of a sudden they were seeing a lot of claims with Fibromyalgia as the disease.
They would see Fibromyalgia with reports of pain, difficulty with sleep, .... and say Oh, yeah, I know about that. Look this person complains of pain, sleep issues, ... They have Fibromyalgia. Claim Approved. Unfortunately, it's not quite that easy.
Because I had to fight so hard for my private disability there was a lot in my records. After my first denial, I did a lot of research to show that Fibromyalgia is disabling and is definitely not in people's head. I backup up my claims with scientific literature from well respected doctors. All of this was in my private disability file so that if it came to a court trial, I would have everything necessary in the file. I ended up getting denied twice by the pd company. I got a call from their audit department. She was the equivalent to an ALJ. She told me to get a couple of tests done. They were actually tested the pd company should have ordered and paid for but that would have been a whole nether battle. One was a Functional Capacity Evaluation where they test what you are physically capable of doing. The standard test showed that I was pretty pitiful, but it didn't show that I was not capable of doing MY job which was mostly intellectual. But as we all know, there are problems both physical and mental and they effect each other.
The other test was a Neurological test that I preformed very well on. In one of the last tests, I had to add numbers together. Like the numbers that were said would be 10, 12, 24, 72, 23, 45. I was supposed answer the value of 10+12, then 12+24, then 24+72, then 72+23, then 23+45. You had to be able to do the math, while still holding that second number in your memory to add to the next number. It was a pretty impossible task. I figured that out pretty fast. So I figured out a way to get the best score I could. I skipped the part of holding one number in my memory. I hear 10, 12 and answered 22, then I heard 24, 72 and answered 96, etc. I knew that that would give me the highest score I could receive.
I'm an Engineer by training and a Test Engineer by choice. I solved problems. I put puzzles together, but without a body that works all the smarts in the world wouldn't keep me from being disabled.
She assured me that if I had those tests done she would make sure that my claim would be reviewed (Fairly). So I did and then didn't hear anything. I called to find out what the hold up was and was told that they were going to send me for a Independent Medical Exam. They were just having trouble finding a doctor. Eventually, I got a notice about the exam. In the mean time, I was talking to a lawyer because I knew it would probably end up in court. We talked for a while and he said that he wouldn't represent me. Not because my case was bad, but because he felt I was capable of doing it myself and he would also have to charge me too much. It was obvious to him that I understood my disease better than he ever could and the catch up time for him would be too long and he would still not be able to do as good a job as I would. So he charged me the hourly rate and told me to call if I needed anymore questions answered. He also told what I needed to do and what tricks the insurance company would try playing on me.
One of the things he told me was to make sure that they sent my entire file to the doctor who was doing the IME. Sometimes they will only send a few pages with a list of questions. He also told me to read the list of questions. Sometimes they put questions in the list that either are unrelated or no matter how they answer would diminish the scope of their liability. He also told me that he would not be able to tell me anything about his report, but to request a copy from the insurance company.
He told me that he hasn't done an IME in a very long time. They don't pay for the number of hours to do it properly and unfortunately the insurance companies use lots of tricks. For example, he was asked by an insurance company to review a case and determine if a specific mediation was appropriate. He did and wrote a report stating that the medication was the correct and most proper medication for that patient. He then got a call from an irate doctor saying "how dare you tell them the medication was not recommended?" So the doctor had recommended the same medication. When they looked at the response from the insurance company it said, "after consultation with Dr. X we have decided NOT to approve this medication." They played word games to make it look as if he said no, when it was the insurance company and they never had any intention of paying for the medication.
So he did the exam and then he said "I have one question for you, how long did it take you write the letter appealing the first denial? Most people would read that and say, of course this woman is capable of working. But it really depends how long it took."
My answer was, "I had 180 days and they got it on the 179th day. I could work more than 15 minutes at a time and rarely more than an hour a day. Except for those days that I went to the Medical library. The nearest medical library was 45 minutes away and that's where I had to go to get copies of the articles and papers. Those days, I would sleep for days afterwards." So he said, that doesn't make you very employable. Nope.
So I got my approval for the private disability and that was included in my SSA file (I gave it to them with other medical records).
So when it came time for my SSD hearing, my lawyer asked me a couple of things. First she said, that I had probably the best file she had seen for Fibromyalgia. Second, she asked why I wanted a lawyer when I knew my file so well? I said that I don't know the law and I also don't know what will happen during the hearing. In all likely hood, I will break down crying and be completely coherent. She smiled. Not because she was going to get her fee, but because she knew that I had a better chance with a lawyer and that I was clear headed enough to see that.
The fact is we DON'T know the law and when you get to the hearing stage that's what the case is all about. The hearing is about whether or not you case file meets the criteria set forth in the law for you to collect Social Security Disability. That's why it's so important to get a lawyer. They know the judges and depending on what judge you get assigned they can determine what is the best way to present your case.
The fee is 25% of your back benefits or $5300 (that amount might have changed since I got my award), whichever is least. It seems like a lot, but the alternative is nothing. I was very happy to pay that.
So we sat down a few days before my hearing and she practiced asking me questions (rather I practiced answering). Like I said, I am a puzzle solver by nature and trade. When someone asks me a question, all kinds of things go through my mind. Why are they asking? What do they really want to know? One of the set of questions she asked me was do you have any pets? yes. what kind? a dog. Do you walk your dog? no, he's 64 pounds and too strong for me to hold the leash. Ding! Ding! Ding! If I had said yes, then end of hearing. If I could walk a 654 pound dog then there are many jobs I could do.
Some judges will try and trick you. Their job is to ensure that you are for real. So much of the evidence in our case files are self report of symptoms which is given equal weight to any tests results and doctor's opinions, that it's fair they see if we are for real.
The other thing she said was that by law, I was entitled to 60 minutes for the hearing. The judge if he chose to could have other witnesses like a vocational expert. That time was taken out of my 60 minutes and the judge is in charge. Some judges will take over an ask their own questions and that's their right. It's the judge's courtroom and he runs it the way he/she wants. The only reason you can get a new hearing is if you can prove that the judge did not follow the law, like not giving you the entire 60 minutes for the hearing. I don't know if the 60 minutes is a state stipulation or federal.
So we brought along my husband and he stayed in the waiting room. He was there in case the Judge wanted to ask any questions. We went in and my lawyer started. She introduced me and started going through my background. The Judge interrupted and started with his own questions. A little after 30 minutes he asked me what the current state of treatment is for Fibromyalgia. I took a minute and said that it came down to antidepressants, exercise and medications to treat pain and other symptoms. Then I took a gamble and a deep breath. I said I think what you really want to know has to do with the commercials that had recently come out about Lyrica. It had been about 3 months since it got approved and the commercials and print ads had been running non-stop. I said I had tried it and it had not worked for me. I said what the commercials don't tell you is that a medication is only effective for about 30% of people. The other 70% either have no response to the medication at all or the side effects are so severe that they can't use the medication.
The Judge stood up and picked up his papers. My lawyer asked if he had any questions or wanted to speak with my husband. He said no, that she has a very well educated client who was very credible.
Same thing Margaret said!
At this point I had 20 minutes left, but we got up in left. We picked up my husband and he was like, what happened, why are you done so soon. We said we would tell him out side. We got out of the building door and my lawyer and I did a tiny happy dance. She said to me you know what this means? I said, yeah he's going to approve it. She said, yep. She then said to me "you had an opportunity many people to have. He gave you the opportunity to educate him about Fibromyalgia. You have done a lot of good for a lot of people." My husband was still in the dark and I explained that because he ended the hearing early if he denied it I could get a new hearing. So he was going to approve.
about 4 days later, I got the approval. It was date stamped the day after the hearing. It was almost 40 pages long and detailed every point of law and how my case file supported it. It was very clear that it was written days before my hearing. The judge only wanted to see if I was the same in person as I was on paper. My lawyer also said it was the fasted approval she'd ever seen. The judge did his job ahead of time and everything was ready. I can only say thank you to the judge because he took the time to read my case file a head of time and so thoroughly that once he met me he was able to formalize the approval.
It was well worth the $5300. If you enter the courtroom without a lawyer some judges will take this as a sign of weakness. The lawyer only gets the fee if you are approved, so if you don't have a lawyer it's possible that no lawyer thought you could win your case.
My judge and Margaret's were fair and honest and did their job. Please take this info and use it to help yourself. Ask questions if you'd like. Every case was different. I'm sure anyone who's been through this would be happy to help.
My case has come up for review 3 times. The first time they sent me to two doctors for an independent exam. One doctor spent 15 minutes and the only thing he determined was that I met the criteria for Fibromyalgia. He didn't take the time and wasn't qualified to determine that I was disabled. The second doctor was a psychologist so I got the what day of the week is it list of questions. Again nothing that really needed to be checked. The second time it was only a psychologist and he told me that if I were to apply now I would never be approved for Depression. My primary diagnosis was Fibromyalgia and depression was only secondary. I was approved based on the Fibromyalgia. The third time just said that they would not be reviewing my case at this time.
The most important thing though is if you apply, you must keep seeing the doctor all the way through the process. If your hear comes up and you are not seeing a doctor (or haven't been) you will be denied. My lawyer also said that the only clients that she knew of who weren't renewed were ones who stopped seeing their doctors after winning their case. I know money can be an issue, but after two years of collecting benefits you become eligible for medicare. That includes back payments so if you get approved and get 2 1/2 years back payments, you will get medicare. If you don't have insurance from another source (a spouse in my case) then the medicare will come in handy. Don't stop seeing a doctor because you get your approval.
Reviews of your status will depend on age. I'm young by comparison to many people on disability (52 now, and about 40 when I stopped working) so that means that I get reviewed more often.
Good Luck,
Kim
P.S. I'm thinking good thoughts for everyone in the process. It is tough to keep working through it, but maybe some good thoughts will help.