bmoberg337,
I think that 2 hours infusion qualifies as pulse dosing. It means that the antibiotics will have a very high concentration (and above the MIC - minimum inibitory concentration) during the infusion but some time latter, the antibiotics will be metabolized and you will have low concentrations, bellow the MIC, during a long part of the day until the next infusion, which can make the combination loses its efficacy, as showed in the article.
Remember this is IN VITRO data and they are doing tests in animals to confirm that. But, if I would try it in myself, I think it should be important to mantain the antibiotics level close to the MIC during a longer period of time and the best way to do it should be in continous infusion.
Daptomycin pharmacokinets is very linear - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC152488/
and maybe the same dose used in 30 minutes infusion can be done in continous infusion to reach the MIC concentrations in blood. But, unfortunatly, I don't find any information about
of Daptomycin blood concentrations in continous infusion, I don't know if there are tests avaiable to measure that and the dose for continous infusion can be different.
Thanks for the welcome, Girlie! My story with Lyme disease started in October 2016. I'm physician (Radiation Oncologist) and I live in Brazil. In Brazil we don't have Ixodes ticks, so the disease is very rare, and it is transmited by another kind of ticks. As we don't have competent vectors here (Ixodes), the Borrelia burgdorferi is different from the US (more resistent, persistent, uncultivable) and the disease here is called Lyme-Like disease. To me, the Brazilian Borreliosis is a kind of proof of concept of the importance of the Borrelia persistence in Lyme disease in humans and I think this antibiotics combination can help a lot of people in the future, but we still don't know how is the best way to use it.
Sorry for any language mistakes.