Why not more use of microscopy?

So I'm learning more about the use of high powered microscopes, light/darkfield etc. to see/identify pathogens in your blood. You can actually identify many types of organisms in your blood including lyme, bartonella, babesia, etc. etc. Why don't more practices (even LLMD's) use this technology to better understand what pathogens you're dealing with and therefore improve how to treat? I get that antibiotics are broad range spectrum killing agents but certain medicines/herbs are more effective against some versus others.

Good question! I for one think it should be integrated into one's practice - perhaps partnering up with scientists, students even, being overseen by experts.

I doubt if #1 would be a reason - as that is the way PCR is....and that is offered.

But #3 for sure - as it takes a person with a fair amount of time to 'comb' trough the blood.

Question: Even if you do see a spirochete...do you know its lyme? Are there others besides Lyme and Syphillis?

There are more forms, including the ones found in the mouth, and others. Seems like the 'kind' can be matched with the symptoms though. Rather than saying "Well, it might be syphillis, or trenchmouth rather than Lyme.

/www.britannica.com/science/spirochete

lifeguardyourhealth.com/spirochete-spore-like-forms/

But like I said, no Dr. with a practice is going to take this kind of time. Matching labs that would take the time with treatment practices are impractical too, labs are already backed way the heck up.

What needs to be 'invented', is a way to run a properly set up smear into a computerized recognition field that can give a instantaneous response.

However once again the right questions have to be asked of it even before the right substance and method is even set up to accept the blood sample. AND, there is always the number of samples that have to be taken to 'catch' all of the invading organisms.

Thus we are back to clinical symptoms.

What I think needs to happen - again - is a research lab set up to draw urine, blood, saliva and tissue samples from known sick donors. Several donors....up to 500 consisting of people from all over North America. This should also include more than just brain tissue from Alzheimer D. cadavers. We know that Spirochetes have been found in brain matter. Were body fluids or other tissue samples taken and checked from these cadavers? I've not seen reports of that.

With matching labs in Europe, Asia, and S. America.

They should pull as many samples and run as many forms of smear fluids and microscopic strengths as are necessary to achieve a base recognition standard for every invasive organism known thus far, and make indications of any others that remain unidentified. That right there would probably take a good 10 years.

That will achieve a proper ID method form to check patients against.

The LLMD I see in WI does microscopy. It is fascinating. It's both frightening and really cool to see. I've seen many different things in my blood... Babesia hanging up in my red blood cells, spiroquetes, etc.

I am going to have it done this Thursday again to see if there have been any changes. I'm bringing my husband with so he can see for himself because he thinks it is voodoo or something.

Bottom line is...my eyes don't lie.

Thats a good starter , dudefromks is getting really good stuff just upgraded his lens and light a wow its clear

here is his work
https://www.youtube.com/user/tylerks279/videos?sort=dd&view=0&shelf_id=0

his might be the 490 he uses slr to get hd