MMS, CDS, MMS2, CDH and variations

Where are we today with these controversial treatments?

I am not considering these for myself as I am not sick enough to consider this option. I am actually quite improved, but today's question is not about me.

My view before I began looking into it was this might be a last resort protocol but my thoughts are that someone who is not extremely ill might fare better with these treatments since these are oxidative therapies. It appears the strategy is to kill the pathogens and survive the treatment longer than the pathogens can.

Yet one could also say this is also true in the case of many drug therapies.

Is ones current state of health relevant to how they might fare on these solutions? Are there instances where it would be just too dangerous to consider or is it as simple as the sicker you are the lower and slower you would progress in the amount used?

I can appreciate the principle behind many oxidative therapies. Some are gentler than others. I am days a way from purchasing my home ozone equipment. I view ozone as inexpensive health insurance, a biofilm buster, and an immune booster.

I am not looking for references to Jim Humble's people or the FDA warnings as I am aware of these polarizing views.

I have searched on this forum and I've seen some positive feedback but from members who only have a handful of posts. At the same time I realize people who are cured do not frequent this forum, but I have a lot of regard and respect for those who have been here for a while.

These protocols themselves appeared to have evolved to where people are making better combinations that are easier to stomach.

If you wouldnt touch these with a 10 foot pole but havent tried it, I have read your comments. At the same time I have seen some people with nothing to gain and even respected doctors have made extremely positive comments about these therapies for a wide variety of conditions leading me to believe there may be something to it.

The general consensus appears to be one of fear and maybe rightfully so but are these protocols considered a taboo subject on this forum?

Are there anecdotes about one method or formulation being relatively safer than the other in comparison or are they all grouped into risky?

Any idea of how difficult they are on the liver and kidney, or if they bypass these organs need to remove the byproducts of these treatments?

Where can I find recent unbiased information on how these therapies have evolved, lessons learned, and the variations people are using today?

Thanks for the bump Pirouette.

I can hear crickets.

If nothing else how difficult is MMS on the liver and or kidney?

Correct me if I am wrong but I believe oxidation therapies react with pathogens (aggressive oxidation therapies reacts with healthy cells as well) and leave oxygen in their wake.

Does MMS bypass the liver and kidney or are these organs the primary way the body removes Chlorine Dioxide?

Thanks Rikky1

I have been continuing research and receiving information. The following is an excerpt I found that was interesting from a link (below) with more interesting things on the subject.

From what I gather this is implying safe and possibly ineffective on the liver, but still searching for liver and kidney toxicity info...

"... it has a 100 percent cure rate on malaria because the malaria microbe is always in the bloodstream. However, it cannot cure Lyme Disease (though it may be able to keep it in check) because the Lyme Disease microbe is frequently outside of the bloodstream....."


/www.cancertutor.com/make_cd/

It does seem CDS is the way to go as it is easier to tolerate yet I have yet to find where you can buy the CDS. It seems you have to make it from MMS as it is not stable for long.

The Stabilized oxygen product that I was using at one time is close to MMS but I think it is 1/12 the the strength. I was totally using this product wrong as I never activated it, but instead was consuming the drops of Sodium Chlorite internally, but it is good to know my error. The good news is that it didnt hurt me.

Thanks to the person who emailed me on the Stabilized Oxygen if you peruse these pages. You didnt say in your email.

It seems if the bacterial loads were high in the bloodstream this could help bring them down but it needs assistance as you suggested from like say DMSO or other to get into cells.

If I find out more, especially on organ toxicity I will let you all know. The more I look into it, the less scary it sounds.

More info that was sent to me: /www.facts-are-facts.com/article/mmsjust-3-atoms-against-all-those-microbes