Hi Allie,
Today, I had my appointment with the chief neuro-urologist in another clinic. I did not expect really much cause I found out that neuro-urologist just don't deal with such difficult cases like mine since they only offer neurostimulation and botox which I am not a candidate for.
However, I was really suprised of his kindness and understanding of my physical and emotional situation but he also pointed out the high risk of surgery in my case due to previous surgeries, small bowel dysmotility, ileostomy (possible short bowel syndrome since 60-80cm are needed to create the pouch) etc.
He did speak very
openly which I was gratefulf for and tried to explain the situation the docs are in with me.
Though he was so nice and understanding I first thought that he won't do anything else than neurostimulation. I said that several sepcialists told me that it would be probably ineffective in my case due to various reasons and that I easily get infections which would be even enhanced by a further device in my body. I also told him that even if it worked some (even if I thought about
the best effect that is possible it would only be a slight improvement since most of the patients who respond to the neuro-stimulation don't have a complete loss of bladder function which I have. That's why I would still need to do self-catheterization through the urethra, and that is not possible with as the dysmotility also affects the urethra and causes severe spasms there as well))
I don't know why he then began to speak about
surgery (and in particular about
the even more complicate continent urinary diversion in contrast to the incontinent version where you have to wear a bag which is not that bad but fdiffers much from wearing an ileo bag since the urine is more more aggresive and ther are much more stomal complications) again - if my arguments did convinve him or if my mail I sent to him prior to my appointment to explain my medical and general situation and to show him that I am really aware of the numerous problems that would be involved in a bladder removal with creation of an internal pouch that is made from a part of the small intestine and is catherizable through a valve on the belly.
He then said that I should be aware of all possible aspects which could come along with this surgery. The uterus might be removed as well if the blood suplly is damaged ir if the uterus falls down. There is a chance that a part of the vagina must be removed with this procedure, too. Of course this would mean that I am unable to get pregnant. Even though preganancy, sexuality etc are not an issue for me now due to my serious problems (I even can't imagine to become pregnant in the future; i never had a boy fried so far) this might change when I would be better and find a partner etc....
I have not heard this aspect before, everything else he told me I was already aware of.
So, this was a long and good talk. He did not leave an important aspect but he did not say that he would not do surgery at all. He did say that everything has to be well thought over since this would be irreversible and there are the high risks in my case. Tha's why he wants me to think about
the new input at least 4 weeks. He is not in during this time either, and when he comes back I can get into contact with him again.
During this time he will also rethink the talk with me and the situation. He said that his chief doc (from the surgical(oncological section of the urology) would not dare this procedure but he wouldn't forbid the surgery either.
So there might be a little hope for me in this issue, however the endocrine issue is still progressing and this issue becomes more and more frustrating and scaring and debilitating as well. I just can't find an endo who is willing to clarify the problem just becuase I don't have the appropriate outward experience etc.
I hope that you get a little hope for surgery in the near future, too.
SArah
Post Edited (pelztier86) : 8/18/2010 1:36:11 AM (GMT-6)