I can't quote using IE 8 and this website, so I'll retype it.
"why would you not consider a j pouch if you're a candidate?" "
Valid question. Why would they develop a procedure and then people not take it. In any case, people answered why.
"Why would someone live with a bag if other options are available is beyond me"
This is a subjective comment. It refers to the fact that if the option of J pouch is available, one can have the option to have it and then reverse it if it doesn't work out.
"being healthy with j pouch beats being healthy with a bag"
This is again a subjective comment. It stems from the fact that having a bag is an extra accessory and not mimicing completely what is normal pre-uc, pre-problems. I mentioned that the J-pouch is the one mimicing the closest the appearence of normal pre-uc. This is, obviously, why the procedure exists.
"I guess, my view on it, I am looking for the closest to normal as possible pre-uc be it with drugs/diet or surgery. Right now closest is a j pouch (if diets/meds don't work), really, for obvious reasons"
Same answer as the previous answer.
Dude, I am not trying to convince anyone of anything. You know why? Cause I don't care. I mearly argue both type of surgeries because someday, I might be in that situation Second, a choice can be argued all day long in any aspect.
"I just get the feeling that you want to argue with those who made the choice to have a permanent ileo when you think they should have tried a J-Pouch first "
This is the only correct assessment you made of me so far. But I want to change the word "SHOULD" to "COULD"
Post Edited (Somedude) : 9/4/2012 9:42:56 AM (GMT-6)