NCOT, thanks for the quick response. I have the same inclination as you in regards to removing everything in the bottom.
cupcakespinkgal said...
If the diagnosis is Crohns I think it is a huge risk to leave the anus. I know I'm not a doctor but I simply can't understand why you would. It just leaves you open for future pain, complications, cancer, inflammation, additional doctor appoints, and continued rectal exams.
The couple people I know of on here that still have their anus have had additional problems. Part of what makes my ostomy worth it is I live a pain free and issue free life. I can't imagine having my ostomy plus rectal pain and inflammation to contend with.
Did the the surgeon that says leave it say why?
When I asked my surgeon about leaving it he said no. He wouldn't do the surgery if he didn't remove everything, rectum And anus. Of course I did have severe rectal disease so maybe that had to do with it.
cupcakespinkgal, thanks to you too. I haven't talked to them again yet. I'll ask the reasons when I talk again.
Two possible reasons for leaving the anus might be:
1- Less complications from the resection surgery.
2- Removing the anus can damage prostate nerves, which, in turn, can cause male sexual dysfunction. Removing the anus specifically increases this kind of problem majorly.
-- --
Although, from your post, I'm thinking you may be mixing rectum and anus. They are not interconnected.
A person can have an inflamed rectum but still can have a healthy anus. You can have your rectum removed, and live healthily. Although you're right that Crohn's can act up on the anus in the future.