The end of March I had 5 in. of my terminal ileum resected laproscopically. Five days later it pulled loose and I had to have an
open inscision resection of a further 18 in. including cleaning up the mess by my another surgeon on a Sunday as well as a temporary ostomy. Because my colon was short, he installed a rubber tube to hold it in place. This tube comes out of my abdomen on the opposite side and just hangs. It drained a little initally but stopped. For a two-week period a month
after the surgery it produced stinky black exudate where the tube emerges which my surgeon said was mucus. Now it produces what looks like nasal mucus.
There is red inflamed sensitive tissue growing on one side of the site on top of the skin and every time I bump the tube it hurts--much more so than initially. I've been putting zinc ointment, Mylanta, (to neutralize stomach acid), and the last time I saw the surgeon, the PA put sliver nitrate on it and it hurt worse for several days with no visible effect. At this time she mentioned removal of the tube pending a fistulagram (injecting dye into the tube) that shows no leaks.
It was my understanding that the tube would remain in place until the ostomy reversal--and this is what one of my visiting nurses said. The surgeon's office was to call me about setting up the appt. for the 'gram the next day but never did. When I called the PA several days later, she said the nurse was supposed to do that and she would talk to her and get back to me. A week later on Fri. I still hadn't heard and called again only to be told she was gone for the day.
I'm now starting to wonder if there is conflict between the two surgeons on removal or not and what's best.
Has anyone had a similar situation of a tube to hold the colon in place until the reversal?