Hi all,
My husband was just diagnosed last week:
T1C, Gleason 3+3 =6, 2/10 cores pos. PSA 3.89
I can give you more info, but obviously we are dealing with low-risk disease. I'm a Radiation Therapist, so I'm quite familiar with the treatment options.....unfortunately, that doesn't make it any easier for him to come to a decision!!
He's leaning toward surgery without too much delay. We're meeting with a Rad. Onc. today to discuss Brachy and Active Surveillance, and have a consult booked with an Edmonton urologist (Dr. Eric Estey) who performs the robotic prostatectomy.
I know that there is increasing evidence to support that VERY young men with low risk prostate cancer are candidates for active surveillance, but I am REALLY not comfortable with it, given his young age. Also, is a 10 core sample really enough to assess disease extent?? What makes me the most uncomfortable is knowing the stats about how many men whose Gleason grade/score is upgraded after prostatectomy, and also how many (even with low tumor volume) have positive post-op margins.
I'd LOVE to hear from some of you younger men about your experience and decision-making process!! Also, if there is ANYONE who has had the robotic surgery performed by Dr. Estey!!
Thanks for your input!
Karen
Post Edited (kuls) : 3/11/2010 10:07:56 AM (GMT-7)