Brewer,
I'm sorry to welcome you here. This seems to be moving very fast for you - biopsy in October and already scheduled for surgery in November.
I just wanted to make sure that before you went ahead with surgery, you understand that you have other options.
I'm assuming the two cores that were found to be positive were Gleason 3+3. If that is the case, you are classified as having "very low risk" PC. You have what is called an "insignificant" amount of cancer. Some doctors advocate not using the term "cancer" to describe it.
What all this means is that you can feel very comfortable not rushing into treatment quickly as you seem to be doing. PC is usually very slow growing.
You might want to read the sticky "Newly diagnosed with PC?"
It is a very good idea to get a second opinion on your biopsy from Bostwick or Epstein. You don't want to be treated for something that is not really there.
Active Surveillance is certainly a possibility for you - they monitor your prostate frequently and you would get treatment if the cancer seems to be getting active. Some men find that taking Avodart while on Active Surveillance actually makes the cancer disappear.
Focal therapy is also a possibility for you. There are clinical trials of destroying the cancer only and leaving everything else intact. They may use any of a variety of methods to do this, including ultrasound, cold, electricity, and radioactive seeds. Here's an example that uses lasers and fiber optics:
clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01377753Other whole gland radiation treatments that may have lower side effects include: SBRT, temporary brachytherapy, permanent brachytherapy, and pencil beam protons.
Since you do have the luxury of taking your time to decide, all these are options you might want to investigate. I'm not saying that surgery is not a good option for you - it probably is - I'm just saying that you don't want to find yourself down the road wondering or regretting whether it was best for you.