kukukajoo said...
Do you have any more info on them?
If you decide on a non-surgical approach, such as radiation, they are well known in your area and nationally. I am over in MS and I know several folks who have used them and are so far happy with the choice. I talked with Dr. Merlin twice, they were great to return my calls. I would have given a lot to have been able to use them. In the end, I was barely able to make a choice in favor of surgery, and I don't think I will ever feel for certain it was the right decision. Other folks, of course, with my exact same situation would have chose surgery and felt very certain about
it. I ended up choosing surgery because:
1: The doc FELT like( a hunch based on his DRE) it was probably contained, and if it was he could offer me a cure. It was NOT contained, which was a pretty good likelihood with my PSA 10.9 plus G9 and PNI on Bx. Still, he felt there was a good chance was contained.
2: I felt like I needed to know. We could not know if it was out and in the lymph nodes and seminal vesicle except with surgery. As my doc said, with the G9 we would not know for maybe several years if the radiation got it or not, if it was out in the nodes.
So, the rock and the hard place: almost guaranteed serious side effects( and I have certainly had them) for a possible cure and being able to know. So, I have the side effects, and what is it I know? That there is a good chance I am not cured, theI have a focal point in the margin and seminal vesicle(SV) involvement and I am likely going to need radiation and/or hormone therapy anyway, again for a maybe cure. Well, would I have been any worse off just going for the maybe cure hoping the radiation would get it all to start with? Maybe even better off? I suspect my % odds were roughly the same either way, but I got the almost guaranteed side effects up front. The guys I know here who went the radiation route have so far done well ( though none of them were G9s with 10.9 PSA like me) and have had only minimal side effects- or even none- so far.
Still, I rolled the dice, and after all it was possible that it could have been contained and I would probably be cured. Maybe I'd feel different about
the effects of the surgery if that had happened. As it is, I'm not so sure.
And that is the same decision Y'all have to make, no one can make it for you. You have to figure out what are your odds that it is already out of the prostate shell. And if it is out, then surgery will most likely not give you a cure. So you will need radiation anyway. So, another argument for the surgery if it does not work, you can always have radiation, although maybe with worse complications. So the question is: if you knew it was out of the prostate ( and you probably don't know either way) should you just have radiation and/or hormone block to start with? Why start with the surgical trauma if the odds of cure is low and you are likely to need all the other stuff also?
I don't know the answer with certainty even now. I have seen some recent studies where G8-G10s had some pretty decent longevity following surgery, with only about
15% needing radiation. That made me feel better, since I know a lot of those were probably positive margins and/or SV involvement, like me. But if you decide radiation is your best bet, you are lucky they are close by. They were frank with me about
my odds and that I would need some hormone up front to shrink my giant prostate, and certainly did not try to influence me to use them. You should give them a call before you commit one way or the other. http://www.prostrcision.com/qa