Posted 11/1/2016 12:47 AM (GMT 0)
The point with all medical costs is the following:
NOBODY PAYS THE RACK RATE!
There are many reasons why medical providors and facilities like to have these seemingly ridiculously high "billed amounts" . When negotiating with insurance companies it's certainly easier to start from a high number and work your way down. But, it is pretty funny that these numbers are so high. And to anyone who thinks that number is out there so the "saudi" sheik can pay top dollar for such medical care, even THEY don't pay the rack rate, they negotiate in advance. Maybe 50%..
Even people with no insurance or POOR insurance, after the fact, EVERYTHING is negotiable and often facilities already have resources in place to adjust pricing down or simply remove all costs that one's insurance doesn't pay.
The three amounts to take into consideration are: Billed amount, the APPROVED AMOUNT, and the co-pay or co-insurance amounts. (that's the one that relates to YOU either with insurance, medicare or whatnot. You'll only pay YOUR portion - the co-insurance amount of the APPROVED AMOUNT.
I've seem approved amounts closer to 80% of the BILLED amount but most I have seen are closer to 20% of the billed amount. Some are like 5% and some are 0%.. yes, 0% of the billed amount is approved.
The billed amount varies HUGELY by provider. I think some just think, why the heck have such a huge number, when I know the insurance is only going to pay x. I've had an MRI billed at 12,000$ and approved at 2,000 and another billed at 2500 and approved at 1800$.. In the end, I pay my portion (usually about 30%) of the APPROVED amounts.
The crazy things are the following: For a not-4-profit, often times the difference between the BILLED Amount and the APPROVED amount is a WRITE OFF. I think from an accounting standpoint that is a crock. Creating millions in artificial losses, for really not having done anything.
Another crazy thing is BILLED amount and even APPROVED amount vs. actual COST of care or service delivery. Recently the university of Utah medical center and the Johns Hopkins medical center have done multi-year cost analysis of care delivery, including materials, real estate usage, power consumption, time and motion studies etc. to come to a closer understanding of what their ACTUAL cost of care/service delivery is and the finding were shocking. Both findings were very similar.
The gist of them were the following: The cost of many services and even consumables was in the pennies on the dollar and often times actual PENNIES. The BILLED amount for services such as MRI and RADIOLOGY was between 10x and 25x of the ACTUAL costs. The costs for lab worked ranged from 1.5x-1000x the actual cost. It does on and on.
Now, historically, organizations could make the argument that costs were rising faster than the ability to bill and they had to stay ahead of it, and also they could make the argument that so many people were NOT insured and therefore they had to generate profit on the INSURED to cover the UN-INSURED.. that argument is waning today for sure.
So, I think we're reaching a high water mark in our experience of costs. We'll see.
For my experience with having had MRI/BIOPSy's at Stanford the billed costs for CONTRAST MRI and BIOPSYS was about 40K, allowed was about 18K, and I paid about 4K out of pocket each time.
For the actual RoboProstatectomy, billed was about 90K total, 15K for the surgeon and 75K for everything else. In the end, the surgeon had about 9K approved and the hospital/surgical suite/labs/pathology had about 24K approved.. I ended up with about 6K total - but only had to pay about 3K since my annual OOPM was nearly met.
It's expensive but as the old saying goes, "your money or your life!"" I chose life.