Posted 5/6/2017 11:52 PM (GMT 0)
Hi, Busman, and welcome to the club!
My pathology was a bit different than yours, but I was just a click or two to far to feel good about AS. I chose radiation, SBRT (CyberKnife) to be exact. I felt that this was a good balance of treatment efficacy versus potential side effects. I would recommend strongly that you look into SBRT. Even if nobody there locally offers it, the total duration of the treatment is about 2 weeks, and some men have simply taken a 2-week trip to have it done.
One other recommendation, one which may go against what some others may feel, is that IF you do choose to read Dr. Walsh's book, remember that he is a surgeon. I found his treatment of all the radiation therapies, ESPECIALLY SBRT, to be almost condescending. In his most recent edition, he still asserts that SBRT is experimental and should only be used under clinical trials. Where has he been these last 5 or 10 years? (It is OK guys, I have my flame suit on. . . ) His material on prostate cancer, the disease, is the best I've read, and he really has written the book on nerve-sparing prostatectomy. He just is not well-versed in radiologic oncology.
If you want to learn about the various radiation treatments, you really need to meet with a radiation oncologist who offers the specific treatment in which you are interested. A doc who specializes in brachytherapy probably is not the one who knows the most about the newest external beam radiation methods. The IMRT doc probably doesn't know all about brachytherapy. You get the picture? See the expert in each specific treatment - they will know all about it.
With your G3+3=6 pathology, though, at least you have time to learn about your options before you have to choose one.