Pratoman,
Well, bummer. I am your age and monitoring my similar uPSAs so may be there with you soon. Not sure yet.
Here are some items I wanted to pass on, in no particular order.
(1) Setting aside your ".00" (different lab) results, considering the others' "<.02" lower reporting limits, and assuming you were probably getting ultra sensitive PSA tests but docs/labs were just rounding and not giving you the third digits...it is quite possible that your real PSA levels were something like: Jan. 2016 = .010, Jun. 2016 = .015, Jan. 2017 = .023, Feb. 2017 = .025, May 2017 = .033.
(2) Have been monitoring my uPSA since Nov. 2012. Quarterly at first, longer gaps later. I have all the LabCorp hard-copies. They “all” show “PSA, Ultrasensitive, W/O serial, ROCHE ECLIA methodology”. I just looked. They all showed results of “< something” – until my recent ones, of course. Up through May, 2013, it was “< 0.006”. After July, 2013, it was “< 0.015”, and has been since. I assume their uPSAs are standard machines nationwide, but cannot prove it. The “Performing Lab:” info did change, depending on which LabCorp
location drew the blood.
(3) If your uPSA continues at this rate, taking into account TA's comments that you might not hit BCR for 7 or more years, and then in average case mets 9 years after that...you do realize that, IF YOU DO NOTHING ELSE, you will be about
80 years old then, right? Don't you think PCa treatments would have moved ahead a lot by then...and you have coronary issues to worry about
for now. So might want to try keeping things in perspective. Believe me, I know it's hard to. Lord, is it.
(4) Do not be surprised if your uPSA comes down or bounces around. I have been monitoring mine monthly closely for months, plus a couple extra confirmatory tests where I suspected an incorrect result. All less than .030 so far. Here is my pattern so far: up, up, up, down, up, down, with the last result being the exact average of them all.
(5) Nobody would want to be the one to advise you to not talk to good MOs and then find out that delay harmed you in the long run. However, please keep in mind thoughts like Dr. Myer expressed in this short video...that irradiating benign tissue is always successful (well, duh...):
/askdrmyers.wordpress.com/2012/12/19/when-recurrent-pca-isnt-cancer/(6) My primary care told me I was being a little paranoid about
my rise. My uro, that did my surgery, post-monitoring and TRT, has not even responded about
my rising lab results. But I am in a mid-size town. You have access to real experts. If you can afford the time and expense, it sure would not hurt to run your case by them for now, even if you do nothing else but retest in the near future. I just do not buy that at uPSA = .029 “come on in, the water's fine”, but at .031, I must irradiate immediately or face certain death. IMHO, there is real societal and personal wealth transfer going on in medicine these days. Some truly justified, some perhaps not so much.
Robert