BSelig-
I'm glad you're slowing it down.
Active Surveillance is a good option. If San Diego is closer for you than LA, UCSD has an excellent Active Surveillance program. They've developed an new kind of MRI (called RSI-MRI) which will be very useful when you have a confirmatory biopsy within a year on their program.
If you want protons, and I can't think of any reason to prefer it to other options, go to Scripps rather than Loma Linda. Scripps has a much better machine. I know Loma Linda is closer, but they haven't published anything about
patients treated in this century, which makes me suspicious. Insurance coverage may be a problem too. Both protons and conventional IMRT would work just fine, but they are a long ordeal (about
40 treatments) and expensive for no benefit over other radiation therapies.
/pcnrv.blogspot.com/2016/08/proton-therapy-at-university-of-florida.htmlSBRT was my choice (see links in my signature). Chris King, the pioneer, is my RO at UCLA. If San Diego is closer, Don Fuller (who you just read about
for salvage SBRT) would be a good choice. High dose rate brachytherapy would be an excellent option, and Jeff Demanes at UCLA is the pioneer of that technique. Low dose rate brachytherapy (seeds) works well for low risk guys too. But I'd caution you to find a seed brachytherapist who is very experienced (I don't know of one in Southern California that I could recommend).
There are lots of good, experienced surgeons in the area-- each of the major tertiary care facilities in the area have one or two (e.g., UCI, UCLA, USC, Cedars-Sinai, etc.). All of the above therapies have a 95+% chance of giving you a lasting cure, and they all have salvage therapies, so your decision should be based on other factors.
/pcnrv.blogspot.com/2016/09/5-year-sbrt-trial-high-cancer-control.html/pcnrv.blogspot.com/2016/08/high-dose-rate-brachytherapy-hdrbt.html/pcnrv.blogspot.com/2016/08/ldr-brachytherapy-ldrbt-monotherapy.htmlAs for seeing an oncologist, I don't see what that gets you. It is true, he
may be unbiased (although I'd argue that every doctor has biases). But he will certainly know a LOT less about
all those therapies than the expert practitioners I hope you will talk to. Prostate cancer is different from other cancers in this regard. For other cancers, we start with an oncologist who then recommends specialists. With
curable PC, we seek out specialists in each therapy and make our own treatment decisions. A medical oncologist for prostate cancer is the doctor we see when the disease has progressed to the incurable stage.