Posted 9/29/2017 12:33 PM (GMT 0)
Zzarth - There are two perspectives that impact this decision. First, the legal aspects. I am not a lawyer, but as I understand it, you are not required to tell your employer about your medical situation until or unless it impacts your work. Even then, it may not be legally required, but as the others have mentioned, if you need your employer to make any sort of accommodation for you to work at a reduced level, you will have to explain why.
Second, there is the perspective of what is right for you. Sort of a moral consideration. If your employer depends heavily upon you and there is nobody who can pick up the slack if your pace falters, you may want to have a discussion with them sooner rather than later.
I am incredibly lucky in this, especially the latter consideration, as my immediate superior (company president) is a PCa survivor, and has served as a bit of a mentor in the earlier phases of my treatment decision process.
Yet another consideration is that your choices of further treatment may be many, and some of them may have more or fewer side effects than others. For example, if you are able to consider SBRT for SRT (IIRC, TA has cited a clinical trial of this), I would bet that other than a few short absences from work for treatments, there might be little or no impact on your work capabilities. ADT can have varied impacts on different individuals, but I've not read of many that were impacted profoundly enough to impact their work.
It sucks that you are where you are, but I believe it won't be as noticeable to others as it is to you.