Pratoman said...
If i had known then what i know now, i would have, after one more subsequent PSA rise, paid for the MRI a year before diagnosis, then fought with the insurance company. Might have made a difference, might not, i dunno, but it would have been nice to be diagnosed a year earlier, considering the uro told me that the cancer was likely there when i had my first negative biopsy.
Same story here. I wonder how many others went undiagnosed because of the no MRI before biopsy rule.
In my wife's case, we paid for an MRI - which showed a spinal tumor. Insurance still denied payment for it. Without it she would have been paralyzed by the time someone finally figured out her rare form of lymphoma.
We actually DID know what we didn't know a year earlier. The PCa was a lesson learned.