There are several substances known to lower PSA. Unless they have demonstrated potential against prostate cancer (as 5ARis have) they should be avoided because they may be masking the best tool we have for tracking cancer progression.
The article by Nelson et al (2017) shows why curcumin causes spurious findings as in the 2013 article bubbatc cited. This is what the youtube video was rightly poking fun of.
Nelson et al said...
Curcumin... is more like a missile that has shown excellent promise in early testing (in vitro), even though this testing may have been bedeviled by design problems that led to several misfires. The structure of [curcumin] suggests that it might be unstable in a biological setting, and in fact, it is: both its in vitro and in vivo stabilities are abysmal (halflife < 5 min)relative to commercial drugs.
To our knowledge, curcumin has never been shown to be conclusively effective in a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial for any indication.Curcumin is best typified, therefore, as a missile that continually blows up on the launch pad, never reaching the atmosphere or its intended target(s).
Curcumin is a PAINS, IMP and Poor lead compound. PAINS, or pan-assay interference compounds, are compounds that have been observed to show activity in multiple types of assays by interfering with the assay readout rather than through specific compound/target interactions.
From a collective point of view, IMPS are invalid metabolic panaceas located inside the center of the black hole of natural products that tend to exhaust research resources. As singular elements, IMPS are prototypes of improbable metabolic panaceas that exhibit feeble performance as drug leads.
A prototypical lead compound for therapeutic discovery and development generally has less than 1 μM potency at its desired target(s), evidence of selectivity and tractable mechanism(s) of action, good bioavailability, chemical stability, and ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicology) qualities that can be optimized in a reasonable number of synthetic cycles. [Curcumin]has none of these features.
With respect to curcumin/curcuminoids and in vivo studies and clinical trials, we believe there is rather “much ado about nothing”. Certainly, the low systemic exposure levels reported in clinical trials do not support its further investigation as a therapeutic.
I'm glad that Mr Bubbatc is not advocating its use.