Another quick update. I saw medical oncologist Dr Peter Nelson at University of Washington / Seattle Cancer Care Alliance this past Friday. I feel good about
the initial game plan we came up with. I will be staying with UW/SCCA from here on.
The immediate next step is a bone biopsy. This will do 2 things - confirm the single bone met is cancer and then if so allow for Oncoplex gene sequencing of the tumor. I also signed up for the "Gentlemen" study which allows my DNA to be tested for 30 cancer-associated mutations.
/www.fredhutch.org/en/news/center-news/2017/10/gentlemen-study-aims-to-remove-barriers-to-genetic-testing-counseling-for-advanced-prostate-cancer.html Being that my father died of prostate cancer at 61, perhaps genetic testing will find something useful like a well-known mutation.
I did get a second opinion on the prostate biopsy but UW did it instead of Epstein lab. Dr Nelson said the UW people who did the review are very advanced and peers of the JHU Epstein Lab folks. Unfortunately it was slightly worse and not better. It appears there are two Gleason 9 (4+5) instead of one. The percent Gleason grade was still 4 = 80% and 5 = 5%.
Assuming the bone biopsy is positive, which seems high likely, I will start with Lupron right after to put the brakes on this thing. We will also consider adding chemo drug docetaxel or abiraterone/Zytiga. We will also consider treating the prostate with either surgery or radiation therapy. I made a separate post here about
the pros and cons of prostate surgery when you are oligometastatic (limited mets).
/www.healingwell.com/community/default.aspx?f=35&m=4068568 Based on my age (48), an agressive, multipronged attack is likely. For now I am enjoying my last treatment free days although I am eager to act quickly based on the G9. I actually feel great right now aside from some pain in my right sacrum area (where the likely bone met is). I've moved my diet to about
80% plant based which is probably helping.