InquisitiveOne said...
Do you think it has anything to do with that PIRADS 5 on the MRI he had?
Could be. Maybe Zelefsky knows something I don't - which would not be at all surprising - he's the man! I've never seen a study about
biopsying without cause after radiation. (I have seen studies where they biopsy after ablation - but that has different issues)
Considering that it may take years for all the cancer cells to die completely, I don't know anything at all about
what to expect from an mpMRI or a biopsy a year after treatment. All kinds of questions come to mind:
• What is expected on an mpMRi? I mean, should the PIRADS be reduced or go away entirely? Is reading PIRADS different for irradiated tissue? What is its negative and postiive predictive value? Does MSK have someone with experience in reading irradiated tissue?
• How do they distinguish, on a biopsy, cancer cells that are viable from the ones that have double strand breaks and are waiting to die?
• Do they have someone with experience in reading Gleason scores on irradiated tissue?
• If any cancer cells are viable, can the biopsy spread the cancer?
• Is a biopsy more prognostic than just tracking PSA?