Posted 11/10/2018 3:55 AM (GMT 0)
I am hoping that someone here can clarify something for us, since I cannot seem to locate a definitive answer in my research. I have shared my husband's story here previously. He is now 2 months out from RALP, 3.5 week post-surgery PSA was 0.06. We met for the first time with the MO on Wednesday, PSA at that visit was 0.07 (different lab/machine so I guess we would consider this stable for now- we were hoping for lower since I doubt we will see much more of a drop this far out). In discussion with the MO, we covered the ADT and radiation treatment options. The doc mentioned that he wanted to get another PSA in 4 weeks to see the "trend" - to evaluate if it is rising is my interpretation of this plan. He also mentioned that sometimes if levels become undetectable, the preference is to wait before beginning additional treatment - I know this is because some men become "resistant" to the hormone therapy down the road. My question is - at what PSA levels do the docs typically start hormone therapy? I have read a couple of publications that indicated not until the PSA is 0.1 or greater. We have a pcPET scan scheduled for December 12th and have follow-up with the MO and a consultation appointment with the RO on December 12th. I am a little uncomfortable with what seems like a delay in getting things done - I know prostate ca is relatively slow to grow and spread compared to other cancers, but also know that the Gleason 9 is higher risk. I am going to push to get the PET scan scheduled sooner - his first bone and ct scans in July were clean and pray the PET will be as well. But, like many have said the waiting is the worst part and it seems like any prolonged waiting time just adds to the likelihood of mets.