Just wanted to add a mild complaint, that being that the post-operative treatment recommended to possibly higher risk men (OLEJ with nodal issue, my positive margin) will depend on who we talk to next. Should not be that way. This is science, after all, not a bunch of astrologers arguing over the best ingredients for a witch's concoction. Guess it is the patient's responsibility to get multiple consultations and choose what seems best.
Sample of what I mean--couple years old now but probably still valid:
https://www.redjournal.org/article/s0360-3016(16)31524-3/fulltext"This is the largest contemporary survey assaying both urologists and radiation oncologists in the management of HR-CaP. Despite the evidence, robust specialty-specific differences were identified in attitudes towards and perceived indications for postoperative RT, even after controlling for important covariables. Radiation oncologists were more likely to prefer adjuvant RT, initiation of salvage RT at lower thresholds, and intensification of therapy (with ADT or nodal RT) in select instances. Urologists tended to prefer salvage over adjuvant RT, higher PSA thresholds for salvage RT, and more conservative usage of ADT or nodal RT."