Following up on my earlier post, met with the Uro. Posting this here for the next guy…
I said...
My current plan, with the approval of my Uro, is to meet with another Uro who does the HoLEP procedures and look at hollowing out my prostate, with a key question being will he remove the lesion when he does so.
So, learned that a HOLEP procedure removes all of the prostate transition zone, but only a portion of the peripheral zone. The peripheral zone is typically where the cancer hangs out, and where my lesion is, so a HOLEP wouldn’t be curative. It would remove enough prostate to drive the PSA way down and make it a better predictor. The uro said an RP after a HOLEP is trickier, and requires a top surgeon. He also said an RO would likely not recommend an HDR or LDR brachytherapy following a HOLEP due to the large void in the prostate. It’d be external radiation. HOLEP provides plenty of tissue for pathology, but it is ground up, so no
location info comes with it. Regarding BPH issues, it should be a one and done. No need for retreatment. In my specific case, he felt HOLEP followed by AS is a good move.
Best of luck with your decision making, JRK.