Dell58T said...
During this time and the experience, what were your PSA numbers?
Most of it is on my signature. In
2012 my GP informed me at a routine physical that my PSA was 4 and that I should see a urologist. I already had a urologist who had excised a spermatocele a decade earlier. He (the uro) said that my PSA was "nothing to be concerned about
" because it was rising gradually over time, and would only be a problem if it "spikes".
A year later, in 2013, I was feeling terrible and generally ill, and my GP ran a series of blood tests. My PSA was at that time 9.5... I returned to my uro to inform him of the spike and he did a biopsy. As mentioned, he only told me that the biopsy was negative. I returned about
every six months to complain of the urethral burning. He would perform a DRE and tell me that my prostate was normal, then draw blood for a PSA, which were around 12, 16 and 20.
In
2016 I turned 65, retired and moved, and got a new GP. He asked if I was aware that my PSA was 25. I told him the story of my biopsy and that my uro had told me it was "nothing to be concerned about
". He asked if I'd had an MRI before the biopsy. I mentioned the MRI question to my uro and he told me that he does not do that type of biopsy. That's when I changed uro's.