Just me, but another view, most here will not agree, though many doctors will, and a few rad oncs. The official BCR is .2, which you haven't reached and your psa hit .12 6mos after op. Im curious why that did not trigger srt in your mind at least then , since you are moving that way
[email protected]. The latest concensus, and I use that term very loosely, here seems to be .1, I remember It being .05 and Sloan Kettering BCR is .05. So that all confuses the issue. If you have epe and negative margins or more that gives impetus to SRT now or at least by .2 . If pathology was like really clean, that bode less favorable for successful SRT, but .... You have a 2nd opinion on biopsy of 3+3, but what was the post op pathology Gleason?, that plays into the decision also. Gleason 6 is the most benign cancer , bad choice of words benign, maybe, but ther e u have it. This is all food for thought , check MSK nomagram for srt success. Talk to rad onc, but they IMO are biased and thy dont have to deal with side effects, not a slam, but that is mt opinion. A lot of the medico's my own including seem to have the opinion, hey thats the next step and regardless of success stats, its worth risk. I don't buy into that with my stats, much less a Gl 6. again food for thought