Posted 12/21/2012 7:03 AM (GMT 0)
Hi there, Fauntleroy,
We may have "met" in another PC forum, so we may already have had an exchange of comments.
I share the opinion of the others here who suggest that you look into a surgical approach. From what I can see, your PC, while perhaps not completely confined to the prostate, is likely to be no further than the other glands that would usually be removed along with the prostate.
Your situation also sounds similar to mine in that I had a huge prostate. My doctor at Mayo Clinic did a cystocopy on me the day before my DaVinci procedure. He told me that "you have a whopper of a prostate."
He went on to explain that very large prostates, such as mine, often tend to deform and also begin to encroach into the bladder, etc. He then assured that my choice of surgery was my only logical option -- an opinion that was shared by the Mayo radiation oncologist that I had also consulted with.
With the surgery, you get rid of the cancer (hopefully!) and the infringement on the bladder, have normal urinary function restored, etc.
Also, as another poster mentioned, you CANNOT do surgery if external beam radiation fails because of all the scar tissue built up around the prostate from the radiation.
You might consider meeting with a urologist who specializes in prostate cancer surgery and see what s/he has to say about the pros and cons regarding surgery in your case. Then you will be able to consider all the different treatment options available in your case, possibly including surgery.
Good luck my friend!
Chuck
7/11 PSA 6.41 (4.1 2009) DRE-BPH,no lumps PCa Dx 8/11 age 62 adenocarcinoma 3/20 cores,T2C Glea 3+3 DaVinci prostatectomy 11/1/11 Mayo Clinic, nerve sparing Dr. Matthew Tollefson-highly recommend! Pathology-tumor confined to prostate 5 lymph nodes, seminal vesicules, extraprostatic soft tissue negative 1x.6x.6 cm mass involving R post inferior, R post apex, L mid post prostate R post apex margin involved by tumor over .2 cm length
Catheter out 7 days, no incontinence
Post-op exams 2/13/12, 9/10/12, PSA <0.1