My stats were very similar to yours. See my signature line below. I was a mix of 3+3 and 3+4 with a total of 6 cores positive out of 14. Both my initial urologist and the specialist I consulted said that if you have any grade 4 present, active surveillance is a bad idea -- unless you are in otherwise poor health and don't have a long life expectancy or you have other conditions that rule out both surgery and radiation.
Many docs set quite strict conditions for active surveillance in the absence of severe comorbidities or very advanced age. For example, gleason no higher than 6, no more than 1 or 2 cores positive, no more than 10% positive in any one core. Opinions vary.
You do have some time. But keep in mind the best docs often have some lead time to schedule treatment. If you spent 1-2 months learning about
your options, then got on the calendar for treatment you'd be treated in 3-4 months which is probably ok in most cases. If your PSA is going up very rapidly from last year to this year then you need to act more quickly. It's very important to understand the rate of increase so if you have PSA stats from the past few years take a look at them.
Post Edited (proscapt) : 12/30/2012 3:09:15 AM (GMT-7)