jim1rob,
You are not alone in getting infections from biopsies. The latest stats I've seen are at 7% requiring treatment. It is rising due to resistant strains developing. And once those baddies get in there, they are hard to get out. I can't really see the point of having yet another potentially dangerous biopsy when you know you have an angry case of prostatitis that's settled in. Your numbers are very typical for prostatitis. As you've learned, some kinds of prostatitis are very resistant to antibiotics.
Here are a couple of alternatives you can suggest to your Uro.
You might want to ask your Uro if you can have the new PHI test.
Here's the link. Unlike PSA, PHI does a better job at distinguishing prostate cancer from prostatitis and may save you an unnecessary biopsy. Another test that involves a urine catch after a prostate massage is called PCA3. If your doctor agrees to give you that test, you can also suggest to him that they test the urine sample for infectious agents that may be causing your prostatitis. A step beyond the PCA3 test is something called the 4KScore, but I'm pretty sure the VA won't cover it. If both PHI and PCA3 are negative, you can feel pretty assured about
skipping the biopsy.
If those test positive, there's another step, an imaging study, one can take before a biopsy. It's called a multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). It's pretty good at finding higher grade PC in parts of the prostate that will always be missed in a TRUS-guided biopsy. If you happen to be African-American, this can be particularly important - African-Americans have a disproportionately high rate of anterior tumors that cannot be biopsied with ultrasound guidance. In the hands of an expert radiologist, an mpMRI can be used to guide a subsequent transperineal biopsy. (We already know what happens with a transrectal biopsy for you).
I hope your urologist is
open to having this discussion with you.