Posted 11/14/2014 2:09 AM (GMT 0)
Hi Viper,
Your numbers are very similar to mine, shifted one year and a little slower.
I talked to Scholz and Myers and others and all agreed, somewhere around fall of 2013 when the PSA was .07 that even though the number was nowhere near the official threshold of .2 that the smoothness of the trend was strong evidence of a recurrence. So I decided, with input from my docs, that if it hit 0.1 I would go to salvage radiation then rather than give it another year to cook and spread. Now, I was a G3+4, hence a notch more serious than yours. I think the benefit of using the ultrasensitive is you have the option to pull the trigger sooner.
Probably no harm in trying the avodart approach. Just be aware that there is a theory (Scholz believes this) that avodart doesn't necessarily arrest the cancer so much as slow its growth and reduce of PSA that it puts out. So if it were me, and if I were using Avodart, I definitely would set a lower threshold of action than the official threshold of 0.2 plus a confirming reading.