Pratoman said...
@BillyBob - very interesting thanks for posting.
It does bring up a question that I've been thinking about.... where it says....
"CONCLUSIONS:
Six grams of beta-glucan from oats added to the AHA Step II diet and moderate physical activity improved lipid profile and caused a decrease in weight and, thus, reduced the risk of cardiovascular events in overweight male individuals with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia. The diet with added beta-glucan was well accepted and tolerated."
The question being, what is the endpoint? Is it lowering HDL? or is it lowering the chance of a (or of another) cardiac event? And the bigger, more important question... are they in fact the same thing. Beause some things i've read say they are not. I am not arguing, i just dont know.
The other question is how do you get the oat derived beta glucan if you want to try it. Which brings me to RCS comment - so are you buying store bought muffins? or making them, and if so with what ingredients that you are assured they contain the beta glucan? Maybe dumb questions, but I'm serious. Because i dont know that i want to trust the makers of the supplement, that i found on Google...
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=Oat+derived+beta-glucan&tbm=shop
Hey Prato, I have the same question as you regarding how you can get this beta-glucan, but going by RCS post it is just a part of oat bran, and I am currently researching that. I am already planning on adding ground flax seed to my diet, and looks like I might be adding some oat bran for hopefully an HDL boost. First thing I've read about
that boosted HDL other than saturated fat or maybe any fat or low carb.
As for the endpoint, did you mean "raise HDL"? I'd say it was just "To investigate the effect of bread formulated with 6 g of beta-glucan (oat soluble fiber) on serum lipids in overweight normotensive subjects with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia." And apparently it improved those lipids by doing the very unusual: boosting HDL, (which did not happen in Group B.) and looks like both groups improved(lowered) the other non-HDL lipids, "however, the beta-glucan fortified diet was significantly more effective".
Now, all of that is real good according to everything we have been told is good for the heart in recent years. Obviously, they even want to give us statin drugs to accomplish those same lowering of non-HDL lipids seen in this study, but I don't know what the heck they do to raise HDL. I just know they all seem to want to raise it(and lower the others). I'm sure "they" would pee themselves if they had a drug they could give us to raise HDL which didn't kill us with SEs. And if they had it they would be telling us to take it, SEs be danged, just like statins.
But does improving all of these lipids which they all claim are associated with heart disease, which all of these docs seem very interested in doing to the point that they insist we need to be on statins, actually increase our lifespans and heart attack/stroke free years? You got me, brother!