Posted 6/3/2017 6:20 PM (GMT 0)
Thanks for sharing this. Control vs toxicity, always the trade off. We've batted this around here before.
The combo radiation treatment seems to probably have better long term PSA control, stats seem to show this, and some quite dogmatically say so. (I think stats are slippery things, and must be used with much caution). It also has a higher risk of significant side effects, notably urinary strictures. For those who suffer from them, they can be quite problematic. Proponents will admit something like a 20% chance of that from the combo treatment, implying it's no biggie since you have an 80% chance of not having such complications. On the other hand, how bad is it if you are one of those 20%?
One needs to think realistically about the potential improvement in cancer control, vs. the diminished QOL if you're one of the unlucky.
The lucky ones post here often, happy with their situation. This is wonderful for them, of course. The unlucky don't post here often, of course probably outnumbered 4 to 1 statistically to begin with. It is a good reminder of what the clinical-sounding "urinary strictures" are like to live with, how they affect your Quality of Life.
There will undoubtedly be half-a-dozen post on this how they had it done and have no issues. We're pleased for them, of course. That choice is personal, hopefully with a realistic risk assessment.
[...reaches for popcorn...]