LuvMyDAD said...
Can I ask you do you know "on average" how effective they are? I know in the past (I hope it is the past) I read studies where it stated it extended life expectancy by 4 months, I hope that is not the case now.
It's really not meaningful to talk about
"average" effectiveness...and here's why...
In general, chemotherapies are either effective for the unique biologies of some people, or they are not. There really is very little to do today other than "try it" to see if it works; there's no screening for effectiveness. Often the numbers might be low--works for 1-in-3, for example, but that's often good enough odds to try it.
But now think of the math involved. If it extends life for 1-in-3 for 12 months, but does nothing for the other 2-in-3, then the average extension for all who tried it is 12/3=4 months.
This pretty much describes the "gamble" involved in chemo...do you want to take the punishment associated with chemo side effects to try to be the 1-in-3 (just my hypothetical example) which gets 12 months extension (hypothetical)?
helpful?
[If you're good with math, if you get your hands on a study of a particular chemo, you can compare the median life extension with the average. That will tell you the skew of the distribution. If you are not so good with math, this last bit was probably gibberish.]
Post Edited (NKinney) : 5/8/2018 9:03:56 AM (GMT-6)